|
cosign-discuss at umich.edu
|
general discussion of cosign development and deployment
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Overarchitecting
It was a late night, so I finally had time to work on implementing
cosign.
I gave up trying to get Kerberos working because I've never bothered
trying it on these unix boxen before (Debian Sarge) so I figured I'd
give it a go with HTTP Basic Authentication using the basicosign.cgi.
After a while of fiddling, I got this working correctly with the
two boxes, one for the daemon and one for the webserver. Gotta say,
I hit a number of snags and confusing dead ends via the documentation,
so I will hopefully get what I have documented for others. Since this
is the test instance, I'll need to re-create it all from scratch on
the real servers anyway, so it'll be a good test.
The one problem with basic authentication is that you don't get a
username/password form with pretty HTML explaining what's going on,
and to have things redirecting around you might think something was
amis. So what I did instead was this.
* Do not require HTTP Basic authentication at all
* Have the /login/ DirectoryIndex choose my cgi,
let's call it "interceptor.cgi".
* This CGI would present the username/password form.
The form is set to POST, and the URL is set to itself
including the ?cosign-service-blahblahblah&http://original/...
URL uglyness.
* When you submit, the perl script does a look up against
Active Directory using LDAP+SSL.
* If you're valid, it doesn't print anything, it simply
changes the REQUEST_METHOD env variable to GET,
the REMOTE_USER to the user it just authenticated, and
then exec's basicosign.cgi.
* If not valid, it present the page along with helpful
error messages, etc, until you get it right.
This seemed like the best solution for me - it didn't involve
re-writing any of the basicosign.cgi functionality, got me around the
kerberos implementation agony (can I say I hate Active Directory?)
and I can have lots of pretty HTML for the user so they know what's
going on.
Anyone have any comments pro or con?
--
Brian Hatch If love is blind,
Systems and why is lingerie
Security Engineer so popular?
http://www.ifokr.org/bri/
Every message PGP signed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|