[an error occurred while processing the directive]

	cosign-discuss at umich.edu
	general discussion of cosign development and deployment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler

To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
From: Mark Montague <markmont@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cosign-discuss <cosign-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <42AF0BC9.4090101@columbia.edu>
References: <42AEBAA0.8020505@columbia.edu> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0506141159550.17299@mozi.lsait.lsa.umich.edu> <42AF0BC9.4090101@columbia.edu>

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Jeffrey Altman wrote:

> That explains it.   Apache 1.3 does not use "libtool".   My problem
> seems to be an incompatibility between libtool and the Sun CC compiler.

That is strange.  While Apache 1.3 does not use libtool itself,
I routinely use libtool with the Sun CC compiler.  In fact,
libsnet, which is a part of the cosign distribution, uses
libtool.  Is libsnet building correctly for you, or is this
an Apache 2.0.x specific problem?

                Mark Montague
                The University of Michigan
                markmont@xxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
  - From: Jeffrey Altman

References:
- Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
  - From: Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
  - From: Mark Montague
- Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
  - From: Jeffrey Altman

Prev by Date: Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
Next by Date: Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
Previous by thread: Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
Next by thread: Re: Cosign, Solaris 9, and Sun CC compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[an error occurred while processing the directive]